Extending Constructionist Media With Emerging Digital Technologies for Critical Computational Thinking
Emerging Technologies for Critical CT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21240/constr/2025/86.XKeywords:
3D printing, Augmented Reality, Computational Thinking, Design Thinking, Coding ToolsAbstract
The rapid development of emerging technologies, such as 3D printing and Augmented Reality (AR), has opened new possibilities for learning. However, their integration into educational settings often lacks a strong pedagogical foundation. This paper explores how the extension of existing, already institutionalized and deeply studied digital expressive media, with emerging technologies can enrich computational learning and foster Critical Computational Thinking (CCT) practices. In that scope, we have extended a Logo-based programming tool with 3D printing and two game design environments with AR affordances and explored how this integration can enable a critical engagement with computational thinking activities. We present three case studies, where students engaged in design thinking projects using these enhanced tools. Our analysis reveals that emerging technologies enabled students to question computational designs, connect coding to real-world issues of their local community, and engage in iterative prototyping of multiple solutions. Findings suggest that emerging technologies, when meaningfully incorporated into constructionist tools, can foster deeper engagement with computational thinking while promoting critical reflection on digital artifacts and social issues.References
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The journal of the learning sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
European Commision (2020) Digital Education Action Plan 2021–2027 – Resetting education and training for the digital age (30.9.2020). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=legissum:4617905
Ferreira, P. C., Veiga Simão, A. M., Paiva, A., Martinho, C., Prada, R., Ferreira, A., & Santos, F. (2021). Exploring empathy in cyberbullying with serious games. Computers & Education, 166, 104155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104155
Grizioti, M., & Kynigos, C. (2021). Children as players, modders, and creators of simulation games: A design for making sense of complex real-world problems. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference (pp. 363-374).
Grizioti, M., & Kynigos, C. (2024). Integrating computational thinking and data science: The case of modding classification games. Informatics in Education, 23(1), 101-124.
Milrad, M., Herodotou, C., Grizioti, M., Lincke, A., Girvan, C., Papavlasopoulou, S., ... & Zhang, F. (2023). Combining design thinking with emerging technologies in K-12 education. In International Conference in Methodologies and intelligent Systems for Techhnology Enhanced Learning (pp. 15-27). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Holbert, N., & Xu, C. (2021). Make with Data: Challenging and contextualizing open-source data with personal and local knowledge. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Learning Sciences-ICLS 2021. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Chiung-Yi Huang, & Jen Chun Wang. 2022. Effectiveness of a three-dimensional printing curriculum: Developing and evaluating an elementary school design oriented model course. Computers & Education, 187, 104553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104553
Kafai Y & Burke Q (2016). Connected Gaming. MIT Press.
Kafai, Y., Proctor, C., & Lui, D. (2020). From theory bias to theory dialogue: embracing cognitive, situated, and critical framings of computational thinking in K-12 CS education. acm Inroads, 11(1), 44-53.
Kafai, Y., Fields, D., & Searle, K. (2014). Electronic textiles as disruptive designs: Supporting and challenging maker activities in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 532-556.
Kafai, Y. B., & Proctor, C. (2022). A revaluation of computational thinking in K–12 education: Moving toward computational literacies. Educational Researcher, 51(2), 146-151.
Kite, V., Park, S., & Wiebe, E. (2021). The Code-Centric Nature of Computational Thinking Education: A Review of Trends and Issues in Computational Thinking Education Research. SAGE Open, 17.
Kynigos, C. (2015). Designing constructionist e-books: New mediations for creative mathematical thinking?. Constructivist Foundations, 10(3), 305-313.
Kynigos, C., & Grizioti, M. (2018). Programming approaches to computational thinking: Integrating turtle geometry, dynamic manipulation and 3D space. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 321-340.
Kynigos, C., & Grizioti, M. (2020). Modifying games with ChoiCo: Integrated affordances and engineered bugs for computational thinking. British journal of educational technology, 51(6), 2252-2267.
Kynigos, C, Smyrnaiou Z, & Roussou M. (2010). Exploring rules and underlying concepts while engaged with collaborative full-body games.
Lee, C. H., & Soep, E. (2016). None but ourselves can free our minds: Critical computational literacy as a pedagogy of resistance. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49(4), 480-492.
Lin, K. Y., Lu, S. C., Hsiao, H. H., Kao, C. P., & Williams, P. J. (2023). Developing student imagination and career interest through a STEM project using 3D printing with repetitive modeling. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(5), 2884-2898.
Leinonen, T., Virnes, M., Hietala, I., & Brinck, J. (2020). 3D printing in the wild: adopting digital fabrication in elementary school education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 39(3), 600-615.
Margolis J., Ryoo, J., Moreno Sandoval, C. D., Lee, C., Goode, J., and Chapman, G.. 2012-12. Beyond Access: Broadening Participation in High School Computer Science. ACM Inroads. 3, 4 (2012-12), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/2381083.2381102.
Novak, E., Brannon, M., Librea-Carden, M. R., & Haas, A. L. (2021). A systematic review of empirical research on learning with 3D printing technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1455-1478.
Papert, S. & Harel I. (1991). Situating Constructionism. Constructionism
Riel M. & Romeike R. (2021). 3D Print your Artifacts–3D Turtle Geometry as an Introduction to Programming. In 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). IEEE, 1454–1461.
Tikva, C., & Tambouris, E. (2021). Mapping computational thinking through programming in K-12 education: A conceptual model based on a systematic literature Review. Computers & Education, 162, 104083.
Tripp, D. (2011). Critical Incidents in Teaching (Classic Edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203802014
United Nations. 2018. Sustainable Development Goals
Werner L., Campe, S., & Denner, J. (2012, February). Children learning computer science concepts via Alice game-programming. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 427-432).
Weisberg S. M. & Newcombe N S. (2017). Embodied cognition and STEM learning: overview of a topical collection in CR:PI. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2, 1
Wilensky, U. (2014). Computational thinking through modeling and simulation. Whitepaper presented at the summit on future directions in computer education. Orlando, FL.
Yu, J., Ruppert, J., Roque, R., & Kirshner, B. (2020). Youth civic engagement through computing: cases and implications. ACM Inroads, 11(4), 42-51.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marianthi Grizioti, Chronis Kynigos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
