Extending Computational Thinking: Embodied Learning Through Socioenactive Scenarios

Authors

  • Emanuel Felipe Duarte Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
  • M. Cecilia C. Baranauskas Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
  • José A. Valente Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21240/constr/2025/30.X

Keywords:

ubiquitous technology, computing literacies, enactivism

Abstract

Although not always understood in the same way, the ideas of Computational Thinking have gained attention from policymakers in curriculum educational fields, particularly in primary math and K-12 education around the world, as necessary 21st-century skills to foster children’s competence in problem-solving. In this work we argue that since its reappearance, many transformations have happened in the computational and social contexts, which make us rethink the literacies regarding computer-based environments. In this paper we extend the idea of computational thinking with a socioenactive perspective to computing, which considers a tripartite coupling of the physical, the digital and the social dimensions of ubiquitous computing based environments. We illustrate aspects of a socioenactive computational thinking with an analysis of two different scenarios. Results point out some aspects to be resumed from the origins of constructionism (for example, project action and body syntonicity) and others to be included in the subject (for example, sense-making, body affectivity and intersubjectivity).

References

Ackermann, E. (1999). Enactive representations in learning: Pretense, models, and machines. In B. Bliss, R. Säljö, & P. Light (Eds.), Learning sites: Social and technological resources for learning (pp. 144-155). Pergamon. https://www.academia.edu/17860759/Enactive_Representations_in_Learning_1999_

Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference? Future of Learning Group Publication, 5(3), 438. https://learning.media.mit.edu/content/publications/EA.Piaget%20_%20Papert.pdf

Baranauskas, M. C. C., Duarte, E. F. & Valente, J. A. (2023). Socioenactive Interaction: Addressing Intersubjectivity in Ubiquitous Design Scenarios. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(13), 3365–3380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2188536

Baranauskas, M. C. C., Mendoza, Y. L. M. & Duarte, E. F. (2021). Designing for a socioenactive experience: A case study in an educational workshop on deep time. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 29, 100287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100287

Caceffo, R., Gonçalves, D. A., Bonacin, R., dos Reis, J. C., Valente, J. A. & Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2022). Children’s social interactions within a socioenactive scenario. Computers & Education, 176, 104324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104324

Danish, J. A., & Enyedy, N. (2020). Constructing with and through the Body. In N. Holbert, M. Berland & Y. B. Kafai (Eds.), Designing Constructionist Futures: The Art, Theory, and Practice of Learning Designs (pp. 245-254). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12091.003.0031

Danish, J. A., Enyedy, N., Saleh, A., & Humburg, M. (2020). Learning in embodied activity framework: a sociocultural framework for embodied cognition. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(1), 49-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09317-3

Duarte, E. F., Gonçalves, F. M. & Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2018). Instint: Enacting a small-scale interactive installation through co-design. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (pp. 338-348). https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292158

Ezeamuzie, N. O. & Leung, J. S. (2022). Computational thinking through an empirical lens: A systematic review of literature. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(2), 481-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211033158

Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed (20th anniversary edition). Continuum.

Fuchs, T. & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense- making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-009-9136-4

Kafai, Y. B., Proctor, C. & Lui, D. A. (2019). Framing Computational Thinking for Computational Literacies in K-12 Education. Proceedings of the Weizenbaum Conference 2019 “Challenges of Digital Inequality – Digital Education, Digital Work, Digital Life” (pp. 1-6). Berlin https://doi.org/10.34669/wi.cp/2.21

Kaipainen, M., Ravaja, N., Tikka, P., Vuori, R., Pugliese, R., Rapino, M. & Takala, T. (2011). Enactive Systems and Enactive Media: Embodied Human-Machine Coupling beyond Interfaces. Leonardo, 44(5), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00244

Mendoza, Y. L. M., Duarte, E. F. & Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2023). InstInt: Design e Desenvolvimento de uma Instalação Socioenativa (IC-23-07). Instituto de Computação, Universidade Estadual de Campinas. https://ic.unicamp.br/~reltech/2023/23-07.pdf

Nordby, S. K., Bjerke, A. H. & Mifsud, L. (2022). Computational Thinking in the Primary Mathematics Classroom: a Systematic Review. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 8, 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-022-00102-5

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.

Papert, S. (1986). Constructionism: A new opportunity for elementary science education. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Media Laboratory. https://dailypapert.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Constructionism-NSF-Proposal.pdf

Roschelle, J., Martin, W., Ahn, J. & Schank, P. (2017). Cyberlearning community report: The state of cyberlearning and the future of learning with technology. SRI International. https://circlcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/CyberlearningCommunityReport2017.pdf

Valente, J. A., Caceffo, R. E., Bonacin, R., Reis, J. C., Gonçalves, D. A. & Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2021). Embodied-based Environment for Kindergarten Children: revisiting constructionist ideas. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52 (3), 986-1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13078

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (1992). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cognitive science: Philosophy, psychology. The MIT Press.

Wing, J.M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, CACM 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Wing, J. M. (2010). Computational thinking: What and why? Carnegie Mellon University. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/papers/TheLinkWing.pdf

Downloads

Published

24-06-2025

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Full Paper

How to Cite

Extending Computational Thinking: Embodied Learning Through Socioenactive Scenarios. (2025). Constructionism Conference Proceedings, 8, 199-210. https://doi.org/10.21240/constr/2025/30.X