Building a Constructionist Community

Expanding an Academic Learning Lab Beyond Institutional Boundaries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21240/constr/2025/73.X

Keywords:

Community building, community outreach, nonprofits, informal learning

Abstract

While constructionism has proven to be a powerful educational approach – leveraging technology to enhance learning across diverse environments – its broader adoption is often limited by traditional school structures and the perceived radical nature of its principles. A key challenge for any constructionist research group is how to effectively promote these innovative practices to a wider audience and support their integration into mainstream education. To address this, our constructionist lab has developed an innovative collaboration model that connects academia with the regional educational ecosystem. Our goal is to cultivate a thriving constructionist community that extends beyond the boundaries of academic research, bringing together schools, educational organizations, and, most importantly, the educators who shape them. The model is built on partnerships with nonprofit organizations to amplify the university’s impact beyond institutional confines. This collaboration draws on the strengths of each partner: the university contributes by developing innovative content, offering formal teacher training, and conducting rigorous evaluations of both short- and long-term impacts on students and educators. Nonprofits, on the other hand, offer the flexibility and reach to implement educational initiatives in local communities, including those in underserved areas. Their deep connection to local needs enables them to co-design initiatives from the ground up, ensuring contextual relevance and lasting impact. This study contributes insights into the replicability of our collaboration model, offering a framework that other institutions can adapt to advance constructionist methodologies in varied educational settings. By fostering collaboration among educators, researchers, and nonprofit organizations, the initiative provides a scalable approach to enabling meaningful and sustainable transformations in teaching and learning practices.

References

Aldrich, H. and Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217–230.

Berland, M. (2016). Making, tinkering and computational literacy. In Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments (Vol. 2, pp. 196–205). Routledge.

Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Kampylis et al.. (2022). Reviewing computational thinking in compulsory education. In Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/126955

Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Fiore, F. (2023). A constructionist approach for the future of learning. Ph.D.Thesis, University of Trento.

Meyerhoff, M., and Strycharz, A. (2013). Communities of practice. In J.K. Chambers, and Natalie Schilling (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change (pp. 428–447). Wiley.

Ministry of Education (2015). National Plan for Digital Schools

Ministry of Education (2018). National Guidelines and New Scenarios

Ministry of Education (2023). Guidelines for STEM Disciplines

Montresor, A. and Fiore, F. (2023). Embracing the challenge: A committed constructionist’s reflections on strategies for fostering an engaging learning community. In N. R. Holbert, and P. Blikstein, Proceedings of Constructionism / FabLearn 2023 (pp. 134-143). ETC Press.

Montresor, A., Del Zozzo, A., Paludo, G., Fiore, F., and Bissoli, G. (2025). Informatics and constructionism for transdisciplinary teacher training. Q-Times – Journal of Education, Technology and Social Studies (Vol. 17, Number 1, pp. 287–302). Anicia Editore.

Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In Harel, I. and Papert, S. (Eds.), Constructionism: Research reports and essays (pp. 1–11). Ablex.

Ryan, J.O., Clapp, E.P., Ross J. and Tishman S. (2016). Making, thinking, and understanding: A dispositional approach to maker-centered learning. In K. Peppler, E. Halverson, and Y. B. Kafai (Eds.), Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments (Vol. 2, pp. 29–44). Routledge.

Stager, G. S. (2009). Eight big ideas behind the constructionist learning lab. https://stager.org/articles/8bigideas.pdf

Tushman, M. L., and Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal (Vol. 24, Number 2, pp. 289–305).

Zeichner, K. (2009). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89–99.

Downloads

Published

24-06-2025

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Full Paper

How to Cite

Building a Constructionist Community: Expanding an Academic Learning Lab Beyond Institutional Boundaries. (2025). Constructionism Conference Proceedings, 8, 261-273. https://doi.org/10.21240/constr/2025/73.X