Maker Education and STEM+ in the Context of Contemporary Constructionism: Iterative Resilience and Community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21240/constr/2025/33.XKeywords:
Maker Education, Iterative Resilience, Productive Failure, Community, Constructionism, Iterative Learning, STEM+, STEAMAbstract
Maker Education and STEM+ initiatives are often celebrated for fostering creativity, problem-solving, and innovation. However, as these approaches gain global traction and the Maker Education movement matures, its technocentric underpinnings are increasingly critiqued for overshadowing deeper pedagogical aims. This paper examines initial insights from qualitative interviews with Maker educators and researchers, highlighting challenges and strategies for shifting Maker Education from a focus on tools and spaces towards pedagogies that prioritise the significance and centrality of community for learning, as well as a mindset of resistance to failure and a resilient approach to problem-solving. By re-centering constructionist ideas of creativity, iteration, and human connection, the findings demonstrate how community-centric practices can transform makerspaces into inclusive ecosystems of collaboration and growth. This work contributes actionable recommendations for embedding Maker Education into diverse educational settings, in the context of contemporary constructionism and in line with the conference’s theme of “Building Communities, Bridging Ideas.”References
Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. Scribner.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Ioannou, A., Gravel, B.E. Trends, tensions, and futures of maker education research: a 2025 vision for STEM+ disciplinary and transdisciplinary spaces for learning through making. Education Tech Research Dev 72, 1–14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10334-w
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company.
Kapur, M. (2008). Productive Failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
Papert, S. (1999). Eight big ideas behind the constructionist learning lab. Retrieved April 2025 from https://dailypapert.com/eight-big-ideas-behind-the-constructionist-learning-lab/
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Andri Ioannou, Chrystalleni Loizidou, Dishita Turakhia, Sherry Lassiter, Stefanie Mueller

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.