A Constructionist Approach to Note-Taking
Making and Innovation in Constructionist Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21240/constr/2025/69.XKeywords:
Generative note-taking, Constructionism, Instructional design, 4E Framework, Higher EducationAbstract
Note-taking is a fundamental learning practice, yet traditional outlining methods often limit students’ ability to actively generate new knowledge. This study explores how constructionist note-taking practices emphasizing artifact creation, active processing, collaboration & feedback, and reflection & refinement, grounded in the 4E framework (Externalize, Equate, Engage, Examine), enhance the generativeness of notes. Using a quasi-experimental design, undergraduate students were divided into two groups: Experimental (constructionist note-taking) and Control (Traditional outlining). Quantitative analysis using independent t-tests indicated that the constructionist note-taking produced significantly more non-obvious connections, self-generated questions, and insights (M = 3.54, SD = 0.52) over the control group (M = 1.63, SD = 0.67). On average, participants in the experimental group produced 53.94% more novel insights compared to the control group. Qualitative findings revealed that constructionist note-taking promoted cross-disciplinary connections and deeper conceptual engagement. Participants in experimental groups demonstrated a higher frequency of novel perspectives, with one student linking blockchain technology with regenerative agricultural supply chains, while another identified unexpected parallels between alternate crop rotation and ecological resilience. These findings support the idea that constructionist note-taking practices transform notes from an external storage mechanism to an evolving ‘object-to-think-with’. The study underscores the active role that instructors play in guiding students toward effective generative note-taking practices. By integrating the 4E framework into note-taking pedagogy, educators can foster a more dynamic, creative, and cognitively enriching learning environment where students move beyond passive reception to active knowledge construction, deeper inquiry, and novel insight generation.References
Ahn, R., Ingham, S., Mendez, T., & Pomona, C. P. (2016). Socially constructed learning activity: communal note-taking as a generative tool to promote active student engagement. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal, 8(3).
Byrne, J. R., Girvan, C., & Clayson, J. (2021). Constructionism moving forward. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 965-968.
DiVesta, F.J., and Gray, S.G. (1972). Listening and notetaking. J. Educat. Psychol. 63: 8-14.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 717-741.
Haghverdi, H., Biria, R., & Karimi, L. (2010). Note-taking strategies and academic achievement. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 6(1).
Harel, I. E., & Papert, S. E. (1991). Constructionism. Ablex Publishing.
Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 147-172.
Lehmann, J., Cole, R., & Stern, N. (2023). Novelty and Utility: How the Arts May Advance Question Creation in Contemporary Research. Leonardo, 56, 488-495.
Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Blasiman, R., & Hollis, R. B. (2019). Note-taking habits of 21st century college students: implications for student learning, memory, and achievement. Memory, 27(6), 807-819.
Parmaxi, A., & Zaphiris, P. (2014). The evolvement of constructionism: An overview of the literature. In Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Designing and Developing Novel Learning Experiences: First International Conference, LCT 2014, Held as Part of HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 22-27, 2014, Proceedings, Part I 1 (pp. 452-461). Springer International Publishing.
Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1978). Note-taking as a generative activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 514.
Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note-taking. Applied cognitive psychology, 19(3), 291-312.
Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11(2), 87–95.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aravind Sai Sarathy, Peter Wardrip

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.