Maker Activity in the Classroom
Solving pedagogical challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21240/constr/2025/42.XKeywords:
Constructionism, Maker Education, Project-Based Learning, STEM-rich.Abstract
Contemporary society requires urgent changes in traditional education to engage students and foster innovation, critical thinking, and ethical use of digital technologies. Maker Education, based on Seymour Papert’s constructionism, emphasizes knowledge construction through the production of meaningful objects, while promoting the use of technology. However, challenges such as teacher training, curriculum integration, and activities incorporating students’ realities and interests hinder its implementation. This article presents a field study conducted in a public school in São Paulo, Brazil, involving a sixth-grade class and six teachers from different disciplines. Initially designed to teach mathematical concepts through an interactive game related to soccer, the project evolved into an interdisciplinary learning experience when a student raised concerns about urban inequality linked to a nearby soccer stadium construction. This shift enabled students to engage critically with real-world issues while aligning with pedagogical objectives as proposed by Paulo Freire. The study shows how integrating Maker Education into the curriculum enhances interdisciplinary and contextualized learning, empowering students to actively understand and address social challenges.References
Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the project-based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. SAGE Open, July-September 2020, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
Bevan, B. (2017). The promise and the promises of making in science education. Studies in Science Education, 53(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1275380
Biazus, M. de O., & Mahtari, S. (2022). The Impact of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) Model on Secondary Students’ Creative Thinking Skills. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i1.752
Blikstein, P. (2008). Travels in Troy with Freire: Technology as an agent for emancipation. In P. Noguera & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Social justice education for teachers: Paulo Freire and the possible dream (pp. 205–244). Sense.
Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors (pp. 1–21). Transcript Publishers.
Blikstein, P., Valente, J. A., & Moura, É. M. (2020). Educação maker: Onde está o currículo? Revista e-Curriculum, 18(2), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.23925/1809-3876.2020v18i2p523-544.
Borba, M. C. & Penteado, M. G. (2010). Informática e educação matemática (4ª ed.). Autêntica.
Dougherty, D. (2013). The maker mindset. In M. Honey, & D. E. Kanter (Eds.), Design. Make. Play. Growing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators (pp. 7–16). Routledge.
Freire, P. (1975). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. The Seabury Press.
Freire, P. (1980). Conscientização: Teoria e prática da libertação: Uma introdução ao pensamento de Paulo Freire. Moraes.
Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogia da autonomia: Saberes necessários à prática educativa. Paz e Terra.
Gil, A. C. (2008). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. Atlas.
Halverson, E. R. & Kimberly, M. S. (2014). The Maker Movement in Education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504. https://her.hepg.org/content/34j1g68140382063
Kenski, V. M. (2012). Educação e tecnologias: O novo ritmo da informação. Papirus.
Martinez, S. L. & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to Learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
Moura, E. M. (2019). Formação Docente e Educação Maker: o desafio do desenvolvimento das competências. [Doctoral dissertation, University of São Paulo]. São Paulo, Brazil. https://doi.org/10.11606/T.48.2020.tde-03032020-171456
Papert, S. (1986). Constructionism: A new opportunity for elementary science education. A proposal to the National Science Foundation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Media Laboratory, Epistemology and Learning Group, Cambridge, MA. https://dailypapert.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Constructionism-NSF-Proposal.pdf
Perrenoud, P. (1999). Dez novas competências para ensinar. Artmed.
Quintana-Ordorika, A., Garay-Ruiz, U. & Portillo-Berasaluce, J. (2024). A systematic review of the literature on maker education and teacher training. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121310
Roessingh, H. & Chambers, W. (2011). Project-Based Learning and Pedagogy in Teacher Preparation: Staking Out the Theoretical Mid-Ground. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 60-71. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/.
Sharipboevna, F. G. (2023). Why Project-Based Learning, What Is Its Essence? International Scientific Journal “Science and Innovation. Series B. 2(3), 379-384.
Soster, T. (2020). Práticas maker e currículo escolar: Desafios e perspectivas. UFRGS.
Valente, J. A. (2003). Teacher training via Internet: Creating a virtual environment for contextualized learning. In Proceedings: 9th European Logo Conference, Eurologo 2003, Porto, Portugal, August 27-30, 2003, 38-47.
Valente, J. A. (2005). A espiral da espiral de aprendizagem: O processo de compreensão do papel das tecnologias de informação e comunicação na educação. [Thesis for the title of Full Professor, State University of Campinas, Brazil]. https://repositorio.unicamp.br/acervo/detalhe/857072.
Valente, J. A. & Blikstein, P. (2018). Constructionism in Different Cultures: the case of Brazil. Constructionism 2018 Conference Proceedings, Vilnius, Lithuania, 481-487. http://www.constructionism2018.fsf.vu.lt/file/repository/Proceeding_2018_Constructionism.pdf.
Vossoughi, S. & Bevan, B. (2014). Making and tinkering: A review of the literature for the National Research Council. Washington, DC. http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_089888.pdf
Yang, W., Liang, L., Xiang, S. & Yeter, I. H. (2025). Making a Makerspace in early childhood education: Effects on children’s STEM thinking skills and emotional development. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.100003
Zhou, C. (2023). The impact of the project-based learning method on students. BCP Education & Psychology, 9, 20–25.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eliton Moura, Mirtes Silva, Bianca Borges, José Valente
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
