From Novice Players to Creative Designers: A Constructionist Attempt with SorBET
From Players to Designers with SorBET
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21240/constr/2025/56.XKeywords:
Constructionism, Classification-Based Games, Interactive Learning, Collaborative DesignAbstract
This paper presents a small-scale, exploratory study investigating how eight middle school students shifted from passive engagement to reflective designers of their own learning experiences. Utilizing “SorBET”, a digital tool that enables learners to both play classification-based games and modify their underlying structures, students were observed through three phases: initial gameplay, adaptive modifications and eventual design of new game content within a design-based research (DBR) framework. The intervention involved two distinct interaction modalities: one group of students engaged with gesture-based and voice-command interface, while another group employed a traditional mouse-based interface. The study explores how iterative experimentation, external feedback and reflection contribute to the development of active, creative participation, as well as how different interaction methods influence collaboration and decision-making. Findings suggest that embodied interactions tend to prioritize rapid iteration, though this sometimes came at the cost of explicit negotiation. Mouse interfaces more often led to structured deliberation, though individual dominance varied. While limited in scope, this study offers valuable insights into the integration of constructionist principles in game-based learning environments and emphasizes how such experiences empower learners to critically engage with the logic and structures behind digital tools.References
Annett, M. (1959). The classification of instances of four common class concepts by children and adults. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 29(3), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1959.tb01503.x
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2016). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. In Design-based Research (pp. 1-14). Psychology Press.
van Beurden, M. H., Ijsselsteijn, W. A., & de Kort, Y. A. (2012). User experience of gesture based interfaces: a comparison with traditional interaction methods on pragmatic and hedonic qualities. In Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction and Embodied Communication: 9th International Gesture Workshop, GW 2011, Athens, Greece, May 25-27, 2011, Revised Selected Papers 9 (pp. 36-47). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34182-3_4
Grizioti, M., & Kynigos, C. (2024). Integrating Computational Thinking and Data Science: The Case of Modding Classification Games. Informatics in Education, 23(1), 101-124. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2024.03
Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (2012). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Routledge.
Kay, A. C. (1996). The early history of Smalltalk. In History of programming languages---II (pp. 511-598). https://doi.org/10.1145/155360.155364
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA; ISBN 978-0-13-295261-3
Kynigos, C. (2004). A“ black-and-white box“ approach to user empowerment with component computing. Interactive Learning Environments, 12(1-2), 27-71.
Kynigos, C. (2020). Half-baked constructionism: a strategy to address the challenge of infusing constructionism in education in Greece.
Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1981). Strategies and classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.7.4.241
Papert, S. A. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic books.
Resnick, M., & Silverman, B. (2005). Some reflections on designing construction kits for kids. In Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Interaction design and children (pp. 117-122). https://doi.org/10.1145/1109540.1109556
Rogers, Y., & Lindley, S. (2004). Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best?. Interacting with Computers, 16(6), 1133-1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2004.07.008
Viergever, R. F. (2019). The critical incident technique: method or methodology? Qualitative health research, 29(7), 1065-1079. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318813112
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maria-Stella Nikolaou, Chronis Kynigos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.